Skip to Content
Main content

PS 160 WILLIAM T SAMPSON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

352
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

113

18%

LEVEL 2

169

27%

LEVEL 3

240

38%

LEVEL 4

112

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

380
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

85

14%

LEVEL 2

152

25%

LEVEL 3

264

43%

LEVEL 4

116

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

180
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

106

36%

LEVEL 4

74

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

131

45%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

76

22%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

134

40%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

187
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

88

27%

LEVEL 3

133

41%

LEVEL 4

54

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

318
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

89

16%

LEVEL 2

136

25%

LEVEL 3

212

39%

LEVEL 4

106

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

347
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

69

13%

LEVEL 2

123

23%

LEVEL 3

239

44%

LEVEL 4

108

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

18

30%

LEVEL 2

24

40%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

11

24%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

79

14%

LEVEL 2

145

26%

LEVEL 3

225

40%

LEVEL 4

110

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

365
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

55

10%

LEVEL 2

123

23%

LEVEL 3

250

46%

LEVEL 4

115

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

34

45%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

30

41%

LEVEL 2

29

39%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

261
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

59

18%

LEVEL 3

153

45%

LEVEL 4

108

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

292
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

70

19%

LEVEL 3

181

49%

LEVEL 4

111

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

91
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

96

32%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

88
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

74

30%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

44

48%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

33

37%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

292
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

106

20%

LEVEL 2

145

27%

LEVEL 3

196

36%

LEVEL 4

96

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

330
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

71

13%

LEVEL 2

126

24%

LEVEL 3

231

44%

LEVEL 4

99

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

349
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 628

LEVEL 1

112

18%

LEVEL 2

167

27%

LEVEL 3

239

38%

LEVEL 4

110

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.