Skip to Content
Main content

PS 158 WARWICK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

83

33%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

101

44%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

38

29%

LEVEL 2

48

37%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

43

37%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

45

38%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

23
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

58

51%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

33

28%

LEVEL 2

48

40%

LEVEL 3

26

22%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

53

44%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

46

39%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

48

48%

LEVEL 2

26

26%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

63

35%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

29

58%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

38

76%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

65

30%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

53

24%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

57
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

88

42%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

13

72%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

13

48%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

83

38%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

91

44%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

73

34%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

53
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

83

42%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

10

31%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.