PS 135 SHELDON A BROOKNER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

85

28%

LEVEL 2

119

40%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

45

29%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

41

34%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

59

41%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

37

28%

LEVEL 2

54

41%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

9

64%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

80
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

102

40%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

85
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

12

55%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

64

24%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

21

57%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

16

57%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

94
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

77

27%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

96
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

11

65%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

104

40%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

50

23%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

91
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

70

26%

LEVEL 2

104

39%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

88

39%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.