PS 289 GEORGE V BROWER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

36

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

22

25%

LEVEL 4

28

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

9

12%

LEVEL 2

27

36%

LEVEL 3

26

34%

LEVEL 4

14

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

20

27%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

66
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

37

29%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

23

23%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

52

38%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

32

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

42

35%

LEVEL 4

19

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

36

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

66
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

44

33%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

17

39%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

10

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

28

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

26

23%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

35

31%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

56
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

40

33%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

14

50%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

5

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.