Skip to Content
Main content

PS 249 CATON (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

157

43%

LEVEL 4

86

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

184

49%

LEVEL 4

66

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

83

45%

LEVEL 4

49

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

112

58%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

74

42%

LEVEL 4

37

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

72

39%

LEVEL 4

37

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

13

54%

LEVEL 4

8

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

13

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

88
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

37

27%

LEVEL 3

52

37%

LEVEL 4

36

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

98
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

74

48%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

125
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

87

48%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

121
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

95

51%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

138

46%

LEVEL 4

79

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

167

54%

LEVEL 4

61

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

19

30%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

13

19%

LEVEL 2

34

49%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

211
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

69

23%

LEVEL 3

129

42%

LEVEL 4

82

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

229
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

18

5%

LEVEL 2

84

25%

LEVEL 3

164

50%

LEVEL 4

65

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

32
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

10

17%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

28

48%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

20

43%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

31

40%

LEVEL 4

24

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

23

24%

LEVEL 3

50

53%

LEVEL 4

20

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

188
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

126

44%

LEVEL 4

62

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

134

47%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

219
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

78

24%

LEVEL 3

143

44%

LEVEL 4

76

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

228
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

168

50%

LEVEL 4

60

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

16

40%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.