Skip to Content
Main content

MS 246 WALT WHITMAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

115

32%

LEVEL 2

142

40%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

121

34%

LEVEL 2

131

36%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

73

43%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

55

30%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

66

35%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

66

37%

LEVEL 2

69

39%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

85

32%

LEVEL 2

104

40%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

85

32%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

21

29%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

24

33%

LEVEL 2

26

36%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

91

29%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

24

50%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

30

65%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

65

24%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

53

54%

LEVEL 2

39

40%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

56

63%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

17

38%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

18

33%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

98

31%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

103

34%

LEVEL 2

114

37%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

76

29%

LEVEL 2

106

41%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

88
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

90

33%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

39

41%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

31

36%

LEVEL 2

35

40%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.