Skip to Content
Main content

NORMA ADAMS CLEMONS ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

133

40%

LEVEL 2

136

41%

LEVEL 3

56

17%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

126

38%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

62

35%

LEVEL 2

77

44%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

55

32%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

71

45%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

71

43%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

51
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

96

40%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

83
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

92

36%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

27

36%

LEVEL 2

38

50%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

27

42%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

100

35%

LEVEL 2

120

43%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

87

31%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

33

62%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

37

67%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

64
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

94

35%

LEVEL 2

110

41%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

104
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

88

32%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

39

58%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

38

64%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

18

41%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

14

29%

LEVEL 2

19

39%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

115

40%

LEVEL 2

118

41%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

112

39%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

103

40%

LEVEL 2

102

40%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

99
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

117

38%

LEVEL 2

88

29%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

30

38%

LEVEL 2

34

44%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.