Skip to Content
Main content

PS 58 CARROLL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

62

16%

LEVEL 3

180

46%

LEVEL 4

130

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

71

17%

LEVEL 3

213

52%

LEVEL 4

108

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

22

11%

LEVEL 3

83

43%

LEVEL 4

79

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

27

13%

LEVEL 3

107

51%

LEVEL 4

68

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

40

20%

LEVEL 3

97

49%

LEVEL 4

51

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

106

53%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

32
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

19

53%

LEVEL 4

13

36%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

39
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

28

64%

LEVEL 4

11

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

229
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

128

45%

LEVEL 4

101

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

235
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

55

18%

LEVEL 3

154

51%

LEVEL 4

81

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

8

67%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

18

43%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

21

48%

LEVEL 4

11

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

43

13%

LEVEL 3

164

48%

LEVEL 4

127

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

49

14%

LEVEL 3

192

54%

LEVEL 4

106

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

21

42%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

301
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

57

15%

LEVEL 3

172

46%

LEVEL 4

129

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

315
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

67

17%

LEVEL 3

207

52%

LEVEL 4

108

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

291
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

49

14%

LEVEL 3

169

49%

LEVEL 4

122

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

292
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

55

15%

LEVEL 3

192

54%

LEVEL 4

100

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

12

27%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

11

25%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

7

13%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

21

40%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.