Skip to Content
Main content

PS 130 PARKSIDE (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

87

30%

LEVEL 3

120

42%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

121

40%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

71

46%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

69

49%

LEVEL 4

28

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

47

35%

LEVEL 3

49

36%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

36

23%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

22

36%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

13

22%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

21

35%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

57

48%

LEVEL 4

26

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

67

47%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

28

40%

LEVEL 3

26

37%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

17

27%

LEVEL 2

25

39%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

106

45%

LEVEL 4

43

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

105

44%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

14

26%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

21

35%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

160
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

72

29%

LEVEL 3

113

45%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

155
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

120

44%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

17

44%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

73

47%

LEVEL 4

35

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

43

26%

LEVEL 3

83

50%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

54

41%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

159
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

114

43%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

116

42%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

13

52%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

11

52%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.