PS 131 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

74

16%

LEVEL 2

153

33%

LEVEL 3

167

36%

LEVEL 4

75

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

66

15%

LEVEL 2

139

31%

LEVEL 3

177

40%

LEVEL 4

64

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

86

38%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

93

42%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

84

37%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

104
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

67

46%

LEVEL 4

37

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

112
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

73

49%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

17

45%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

107
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

109

40%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

95

38%

LEVEL 3

87

35%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

153

40%

LEVEL 4

74

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

108

29%

LEVEL 3

164

45%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

37

43%

LEVEL 2

35

40%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

32

41%

LEVEL 2

31

39%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

218
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

95

28%

LEVEL 3

144

43%

LEVEL 4

74

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

219
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

158

46%

LEVEL 4

61

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

24
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

52

39%

LEVEL 2

58

43%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

40

39%

LEVEL 2

40

39%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

24

39%

LEVEL 4

15

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

23

40%

LEVEL 4

12

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

203
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

69

17%

LEVEL 2

135

33%

LEVEL 3

143

35%

LEVEL 4

60

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

55

14%

LEVEL 2

128

33%

LEVEL 3

154

40%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

237
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

72

16%

LEVEL 2

151

33%

LEVEL 3

162

35%

LEVEL 4

75

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

234
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

62

14%

LEVEL 2

132

31%

LEVEL 3

173

40%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.