Skip to Content
Main content

PS 172 BEACON SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

130

56%

LEVEL 4

92

39%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

20

9%

LEVEL 3

101

47%

LEVEL 4

89

41%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

61

58%

LEVEL 4

42

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

6

6%

LEVEL 3

53

50%

LEVEL 4

46

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

69

54%

LEVEL 4

50

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

48

44%

LEVEL 4

43

39%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

9

56%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

8

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

15

56%

LEVEL 4

11

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

13

46%

LEVEL 4

13

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

173
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

5%

LEVEL 3

104

57%

LEVEL 4

69

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

141
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

77

47%

LEVEL 4

64

39%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

88

52%

LEVEL 4

76

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

71

46%

LEVEL 4

68

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

58
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

42

66%

LEVEL 4

16

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

51
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

30

48%

LEVEL 4

21

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

203
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

112

52%

LEVEL 4

91

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

171
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

20

10%

LEVEL 3

83

42%

LEVEL 4

88

45%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

18

95%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

18

95%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

14

56%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

14

52%

LEVEL 4

11

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

6%

LEVEL 3

116

56%

LEVEL 4

81

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

87

46%

LEVEL 4

78

41%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

217
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

4%

LEVEL 3

127

56%

LEVEL 4

90

40%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.