Skip to Content
Main content

PS 24 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

115

41%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

101

40%

LEVEL 2

86

34%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

56

40%

LEVEL 2

55

39%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

46

37%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

59

41%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

55

43%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

110

41%

LEVEL 2

107

40%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

93

39%

LEVEL 2

82

34%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

77

34%

LEVEL 2

97

42%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

74

37%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

38

70%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

27

53%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

78

46%

LEVEL 3

47

28%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

57
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

58

40%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

79

69%

LEVEL 2

33

29%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

71

66%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

113

42%

LEVEL 2

106

39%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

99

42%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

54
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

111

42%

LEVEL 2

102

38%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

88

39%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.