Skip to Content
Main content

PS 29 JOHN M HARRIGAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

73

20%

LEVEL 3

152

42%

LEVEL 4

119

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

74

19%

LEVEL 3

170

44%

LEVEL 4

133

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

80

43%

LEVEL 4

75

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

163
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

81

41%

LEVEL 4

82

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

72

41%

LEVEL 4

44

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

89

46%

LEVEL 4

51

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

23
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

11

35%

LEVEL 4

12

39%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

12

55%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

10

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

10

50%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

209
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

51

19%

LEVEL 3

120

44%

LEVEL 4

89

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

234
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

59

20%

LEVEL 3

128

43%

LEVEL 4

106

35%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

15

43%

LEVEL 4

8

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

20

51%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

50

15%

LEVEL 3

144

44%

LEVEL 4

117

36%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

53

16%

LEVEL 3

149

44%

LEVEL 4

130

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

23

61%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

21

44%

LEVEL 3

21

44%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

269
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

69

19%

LEVEL 3

150

42%

LEVEL 4

119

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

302
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

66

17%

LEVEL 3

169

45%

LEVEL 4

133

35%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

8

73%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

255
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

58

18%

LEVEL 3

143

44%

LEVEL 4

112

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

273
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

65

19%

LEVEL 3

152

44%

LEVEL 4

121

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

12

28%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

18

40%

LEVEL 4

12

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.