PS 8 ROBERT FULTON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

386
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

86

17%

LEVEL 3

220

44%

LEVEL 4

166

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

37

8%

LEVEL 2

60

13%

LEVEL 3

192

42%

LEVEL 4

163

36%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

38

16%

LEVEL 3

99

41%

LEVEL 4

98

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

163
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

22

11%

LEVEL 3

78

39%

LEVEL 4

85

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

189
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

121

47%

LEVEL 4

68

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

192
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

38

15%

LEVEL 3

114

45%

LEVEL 4

78

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

31
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

18

55%

LEVEL 4

13

39%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

18

49%

LEVEL 4

16

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

232
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

33

12%

LEVEL 3

133

49%

LEVEL 4

99

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

27

11%

LEVEL 3

107

45%

LEVEL 4

95

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

52
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

29

34%

LEVEL 4

23

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

25

37%

LEVEL 4

21

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

21

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

365
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

62

14%

LEVEL 3

203

47%

LEVEL 4

162

38%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

51

13%

LEVEL 3

177

43%

LEVEL 4

160

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

21

32%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

18

40%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

382
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

83

17%

LEVEL 3

216

44%

LEVEL 4

166

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

353
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

58

13%

LEVEL 3

190

43%

LEVEL 4

163

37%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

326
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

49

13%

LEVEL 3

176

46%

LEVEL 4

150

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

293
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

35

10%

LEVEL 3

155

46%

LEVEL 4

138

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

44

39%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

28

24%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

25

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

383
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

78

16%

LEVEL 3

219

45%

LEVEL 4

164

34%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

353
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

58

13%

LEVEL 3

190

43%

LEVEL 4

163

37%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.