BRONX SCHOOL FOR LAW, GOV, JUSTICE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

49

35%

LEVEL 4

40

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

34

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

25

21%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

32

28%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

35

31%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

25

38%

LEVEL 4

17

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

18

32%

LEVEL 4

14

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

96
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

39

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

94
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

62

32%

LEVEL 3

64

33%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

56

27%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

57

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

78

38%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

21

44%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

23

41%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

140
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

82

36%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

126
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

80

36%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

18

55%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

24

60%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

8

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

5

15%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

50

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

125
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

52

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

121
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

10

33%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

15

60%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.