Skip to Content
Main content

PS 214 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 727

LEVEL 1

334

46%

LEVEL 2

220

30%

LEVEL 3

121

17%

LEVEL 4

52

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 741

LEVEL 1

308

42%

LEVEL 2

244

33%

LEVEL 3

134

18%

LEVEL 4

55

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

137

38%

LEVEL 2

119

33%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

112
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

128

35%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

197

53%

LEVEL 2

101

27%

LEVEL 3

53

14%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

180

47%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

53

14%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

11

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

9

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

82

46%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

57
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

75

38%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

105
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

241

48%

LEVEL 2

152

31%

LEVEL 3

75

15%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

218

44%

LEVEL 2

169

34%

LEVEL 3

83

17%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

234

39%

LEVEL 2

194

33%

LEVEL 3

113

19%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

206

34%

LEVEL 2

210

35%

LEVEL 3

129

22%

LEVEL 4

54

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

100

75%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

102

72%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

172
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 654

LEVEL 1

279

43%

LEVEL 2

203

31%

LEVEL 3

120

18%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

188
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 660

LEVEL 1

246

37%

LEVEL 2

226

34%

LEVEL 3

133

20%

LEVEL 4

55

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

55

75%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

62

77%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

30

36%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

36

32%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

304

47%

LEVEL 2

194

30%

LEVEL 3

99

15%

LEVEL 4

46

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

272

43%

LEVEL 2

205

33%

LEVEL 3

105

17%

LEVEL 4

45

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

160
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 636

LEVEL 1

283

44%

LEVEL 2

193

30%

LEVEL 3

113

18%

LEVEL 4

47

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

161
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

257

40%

LEVEL 2

224

35%

LEVEL 3

115

18%

LEVEL 4

46

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

51

56%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

51

52%

LEVEL 2

20

20%

LEVEL 3

19

19%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.