PS 41 GUN HILL ROAD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

151

34%

LEVEL 2

116

26%

LEVEL 3

112

25%

LEVEL 4

69

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

176

39%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

124

28%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

70

29%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

99
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

77

33%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

81

39%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

99

46%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

93
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

80

34%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

74
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

91

39%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

61

26%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

52

26%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

77

40%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

108

29%

LEVEL 2

96

26%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

109

30%

LEVEL 2

106

29%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

43

59%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

67

79%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

181
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

125

31%

LEVEL 2

100

25%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

149
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

137

35%

LEVEL 2

111

28%

LEVEL 3

119

30%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

26

62%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

39

76%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

80%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

151

34%

LEVEL 2

116

26%

LEVEL 3

108

24%

LEVEL 4

68

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

172

40%

LEVEL 2

111

26%

LEVEL 3

120

28%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

156
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

107

30%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

136
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

143

38%

LEVEL 2

95

25%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

44

50%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

33

45%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.