Skip to Content
Main content

PS 76 BENNINGTON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

202

41%

LEVEL 2

178

37%

LEVEL 3

91

19%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

206

46%

LEVEL 2

142

32%

LEVEL 3

85

19%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

84

36%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

56

24%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

84

40%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

118

47%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

122

51%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

7

70%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

21

62%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

19

53%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

54
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

104

43%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

88

42%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

73

38%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

92

49%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

139

34%

LEVEL 2

165

40%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

137

37%

LEVEL 2

130

35%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

63

83%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

69

84%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

106
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

165

38%

LEVEL 2

161

37%

LEVEL 3

90

21%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

155

40%

LEVEL 2

134

34%

LEVEL 3

85

22%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

37

67%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

51

86%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

35

29%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

37

36%

LEVEL 2

35

34%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

167

46%

LEVEL 2

131

36%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

169

49%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

59

17%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

104
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

176

40%

LEVEL 2

157

36%

LEVEL 3

89

20%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

93
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

179

45%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

26

52%

LEVEL 2

21

42%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

27

56%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.