Skip to Content
Main content

PS 178 DR SELMAN WAKSMAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

72

30%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

46

41%

LEVEL 3

37

33%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

18

19%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

38

40%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

48

38%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

44

37%

LEVEL 2

51

43%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

48

32%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

36

27%

LEVEL 2

49

37%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

18

30%

LEVEL 2

25

41%

LEVEL 3

18

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

20

34%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

82

45%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

39

68%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

31

62%

LEVEL 2

15

30%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

72
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

67

29%

LEVEL 2

90

39%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

70
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

55

27%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

19

35%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

13

24%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

58

32%

LEVEL 2

74

40%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

67
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

61

30%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

51

28%

LEVEL 2

70

39%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

16

50%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.