PS 103 HECTOR FONTANEZ GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

212

38%

LEVEL 2

179

32%

LEVEL 3

127

23%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

164

32%

LEVEL 2

168

33%

LEVEL 3

135

26%

LEVEL 4

44

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

105

36%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

107

40%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

98

38%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

100
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

101

35%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

110
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

63

24%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

95

43%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

84

41%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

134

30%

LEVEL 2

157

35%

LEVEL 3

122

27%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

93

23%

LEVEL 2

145

36%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

78

73%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

71

69%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

168
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

144

31%

LEVEL 2

154

33%

LEVEL 3

127

27%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

170
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

98

24%

LEVEL 2

143

35%

LEVEL 3

127

31%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

68

73%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

66

66%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

17

24%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

12

19%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

12

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

195

40%

LEVEL 2

161

33%

LEVEL 3

104

21%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

152

34%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

118

26%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

149
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

180

37%

LEVEL 2

160

33%

LEVEL 3

111

23%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

167
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

146

32%

LEVEL 2

147

32%

LEVEL 3

124

27%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

32

46%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

21

41%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.