Skip to Content
Main content

IN-TECH ACADEMY (MS/HS 368) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

132

29%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

156

34%

LEVEL 2

131

29%

LEVEL 3

90

20%

LEVEL 4

78

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

44

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

91

41%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

104

42%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

14

38%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

12

35%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

146
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

112

29%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

141
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

135

34%

LEVEL 2

116

30%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

66

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

79

22%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

112

30%

LEVEL 3

83

23%

LEVEL 4

76

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

53

58%

LEVEL 2

32

35%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

59

68%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

168
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

88

24%

LEVEL 4

78

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

62

72%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

73

85%

LEVEL 2

11

13%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

13

20%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

18

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

119

31%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

85

22%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

145

37%

LEVEL 2

113

29%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

60

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

153
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

107

28%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

116

31%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

70

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

25

41%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

40

49%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.