Skip to Content
Main content

IS 254 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

159

39%

LEVEL 2

142

35%

LEVEL 3

71

17%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

209

46%

LEVEL 2

151

33%

LEVEL 3

68

15%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

57

29%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

35

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

81

36%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

48

21%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

102

48%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

128

56%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

20

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

25

33%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

29

39%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

129

40%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

175

48%

LEVEL 2

125

34%

LEVEL 3

45

12%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

81

28%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

114

35%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

78

67%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

95

73%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

107
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

85

29%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

93

32%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

65

22%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

74

63%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

116

72%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

146

39%

LEVEL 2

133

36%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

195

47%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

59

14%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

92
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

123

37%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

79
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

158

43%

LEVEL 2

127

35%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

36

46%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

51

57%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.