Skip to Content
Main content

PS 279 CAPT MANUEL RIVERA JR GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

231

32%

LEVEL 2

297

41%

LEVEL 3

139

19%

LEVEL 4

53

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 696

LEVEL 1

243

35%

LEVEL 2

234

34%

LEVEL 3

158

23%

LEVEL 4

61

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

89

26%

LEVEL 2

141

41%

LEVEL 3

85

24%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

94

29%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

142

38%

LEVEL 2

156

42%

LEVEL 3

54

15%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

149

40%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

79

21%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

7

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

7

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

41

34%

LEVEL 2

52

44%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

44

40%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

147
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

182

32%

LEVEL 2

237

42%

LEVEL 3

106

19%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

171
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

193

35%

LEVEL 2

190

34%

LEVEL 3

124

22%

LEVEL 4

47

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 581

LEVEL 1

158

27%

LEVEL 2

242

42%

LEVEL 3

128

22%

LEVEL 4

53

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

177

32%

LEVEL 2

189

34%

LEVEL 3

136

24%

LEVEL 4

58

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

73

53%

LEVEL 2

55

40%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

66

49%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

174
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

102

20%

LEVEL 2

232

46%

LEVEL 3

122

24%

LEVEL 4

52

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

208
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

123

24%

LEVEL 2

188

36%

LEVEL 3

147

28%

LEVEL 4

61

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

129

61%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

120

68%

LEVEL 2

46

26%

LEVEL 3

11

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

8

25%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

8

28%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 688

LEVEL 1

223

32%

LEVEL 2

286

42%

LEVEL 3

133

19%

LEVEL 4

46

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

207
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 667

LEVEL 1

235

35%

LEVEL 2

225

34%

LEVEL 3

152

23%

LEVEL 4

55

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

148
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

166

33%

LEVEL 2

191

38%

LEVEL 3

107

21%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

155
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

148

31%

LEVEL 2

175

37%

LEVEL 3

114

24%

LEVEL 4

41

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

65

30%

LEVEL 2

106

49%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

95

44%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.