Skip to Content
Main content

PS 306 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

151

42%

LEVEL 2

113

32%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

118

38%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

67

34%

LEVEL 2

73

37%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

64

36%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

54

31%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

84

53%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

54

39%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

41

41%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

28

28%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

32

37%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

25

29%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

107

43%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

84

39%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

104

36%

LEVEL 2

94

33%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

77

31%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

47

66%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

41

63%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

104

35%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

102
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

78

31%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

47

78%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

40

69%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

12

44%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

139

44%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

71

22%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

112

39%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

78

27%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

121

43%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

69

24%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

88
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

95

37%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

75

29%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

30

41%

LEVEL 2

30

41%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

23

40%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

15

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.