Skip to Content
Main content

PS 91 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

121

35%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

127

39%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

49

28%

LEVEL 2

72

42%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

60

35%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

72

43%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

67

43%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

20

31%

LEVEL 2

26

40%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

21

39%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

93

38%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

100

40%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

108

42%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

75

29%

LEVEL 2

97

38%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

53

65%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

12

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

52

71%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

90
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

98

41%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

85
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

62

27%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

72

69%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

65

64%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

117

37%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

126

40%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

73

32%

LEVEL 2

83

36%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

84

38%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

48

43%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

43

39%

LEVEL 2

38

35%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.