Skip to Content
Main content

PS 205 FIORELLO LAGUARDIA GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

165

33%

LEVEL 2

204

40%

LEVEL 3

123

24%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

116

24%

LEVEL 2

175

37%

LEVEL 3

148

31%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

78

29%

LEVEL 2

115

42%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

96

37%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

87

37%

LEVEL 2

89

38%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

79

36%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

12

46%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

24

39%

LEVEL 2

26

42%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

24

34%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

106
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

132

33%

LEVEL 2

167

41%

LEVEL 3

95

23%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

140
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

87

24%

LEVEL 2

142

38%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

105

26%

LEVEL 2

164

41%

LEVEL 3

115

29%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

78

20%

LEVEL 2

135

35%

LEVEL 3

132

34%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

60

56%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

38

40%

LEVEL 2

40

42%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

123
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

112

28%

LEVEL 2

158

40%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

180
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

71

18%

LEVEL 2

133

35%

LEVEL 3

140

36%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

53

47%

LEVEL 2

46

41%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

45

47%

LEVEL 2

42

44%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

18

40%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

24

47%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

155

34%

LEVEL 2

190

41%

LEVEL 3

105

23%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

106

25%

LEVEL 2

164

38%

LEVEL 3

124

29%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

121
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

133

31%

LEVEL 2

182

42%

LEVEL 3

107

25%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

168
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

101

24%

LEVEL 2

152

36%

LEVEL 3

130

31%

LEVEL 4

38

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

32

46%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

15

26%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

18

31%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.