JHS 80 MOSHOLU PARKWAY (THE) GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 631

LEVEL 1

256

41%

LEVEL 2

175

28%

LEVEL 3

141

22%

LEVEL 4

59

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

253

42%

LEVEL 2

170

28%

LEVEL 3

129

21%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

93

34%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

101

37%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

163

46%

LEVEL 2

98

28%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

152

46%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

29

36%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

14

18%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

25

36%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

29

37%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

28

35%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

119
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

191

44%

LEVEL 2

124

29%

LEVEL 3

88

20%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

191

45%

LEVEL 2

118

28%

LEVEL 3

86

20%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

160

33%

LEVEL 2

145

30%

LEVEL 3

122

25%

LEVEL 4

58

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

146

33%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

115

26%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

96

66%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

107

68%

LEVEL 2

36

23%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

194
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

109

25%

LEVEL 2

128

30%

LEVEL 3

135

31%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

172
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

130

30%

LEVEL 2

136

31%

LEVEL 3

121

28%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

147

74%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

123

75%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

14

23%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

23

38%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

24

39%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

242

42%

LEVEL 2

163

29%

LEVEL 3

118

21%

LEVEL 4

48

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

229

42%

LEVEL 2

153

28%

LEVEL 3

116

21%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

162
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

193

39%

LEVEL 2

136

28%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

189

41%

LEVEL 2

142

31%

LEVEL 3

98

21%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

38
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

63

45%

LEVEL 2

39

28%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

47
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

64

46%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.