Skip to Content
Main content

PS 85 GREAT EXPECTATIONS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

215

50%

LEVEL 2

143

33%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

188

46%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

98

46%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

82

42%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

117

53%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

106

50%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

59

53%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

34

33%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

154

49%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

153

51%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

138

43%

LEVEL 2

117

36%

LEVEL 3

58

18%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

111

36%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

77

71%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

77

77%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

67
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

132

43%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

89
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

97

34%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

83

67%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

91

76%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

207

50%

LEVEL 2

134

33%

LEVEL 3

60

15%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

181

46%

LEVEL 2

122

31%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

65
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

167

47%

LEVEL 2

124

35%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

156

45%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

48

62%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

32

53%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.