Skip to Content
Main content

PS 33 TIMOTHY DWIGHT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

132

33%

LEVEL 2

149

37%

LEVEL 3

95

24%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

179

46%

LEVEL 2

135

34%

LEVEL 3

64

16%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

54

27%

LEVEL 2

81

41%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

82

43%

LEVEL 2

69

36%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

78

39%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

97

48%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

19

44%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

18

41%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

94
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

118

35%

LEVEL 2

123

37%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

155

47%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

96

30%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

128

42%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

36

43%

LEVEL 2

38

46%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

51

61%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

114
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

77

25%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

128

41%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

55

65%

LEVEL 2

26

31%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

51

66%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

9

27%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

13

39%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

123

34%

LEVEL 2

142

39%

LEVEL 3

82

22%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

171

46%

LEVEL 2

128

35%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

112
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

121

32%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

74
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

161

44%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

18

72%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.