Skip to Content
Main content

PS 37 MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

128

31%

LEVEL 2

167

41%

LEVEL 3

79

19%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

122

31%

LEVEL 2

153

38%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

52

26%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

46

23%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

76

36%

LEVEL 2

90

43%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

76

38%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

32

31%

LEVEL 2

41

40%

LEVEL 3

20

20%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

23

27%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

80
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

93

32%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

96

33%

LEVEL 2

110

38%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

69

23%

LEVEL 2

120

41%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

60

20%

LEVEL 2

124

42%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

59

51%

LEVEL 2

47

41%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

62

60%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

91

26%

LEVEL 2

150

42%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

85

25%

LEVEL 2

133

39%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

37

64%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

37

63%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

16

25%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

21

34%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

112

32%

LEVEL 2

148

43%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

111

33%

LEVEL 2

136

40%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

98
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

100

30%

LEVEL 2

136

41%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

106
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

89

28%

LEVEL 2

119

38%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

28

36%

LEVEL 2

31

40%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

33

38%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.