THOMAS C GIORDANO MS 45 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

205

31%

LEVEL 2

254

38%

LEVEL 3

149

22%

LEVEL 4

56

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 672

LEVEL 1

230

34%

LEVEL 2

231

34%

LEVEL 3

149

22%

LEVEL 4

62

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

146

43%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

96

28%

LEVEL 2

117

34%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

140

43%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

134

41%

LEVEL 2

114

35%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

39

36%

LEVEL 2

48

44%

LEVEL 3

17

16%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

46

41%

LEVEL 2

42

37%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

167
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

151

30%

LEVEL 2

192

38%

LEVEL 3

122

24%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

176
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

170

32%

LEVEL 2

179

34%

LEVEL 3

128

24%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

141

26%

LEVEL 2

216

40%

LEVEL 3

136

25%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

157

28%

LEVEL 2

201

36%

LEVEL 3

137

25%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

64

54%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

73

63%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

198
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

122

23%

LEVEL 2

222

41%

LEVEL 3

142

26%

LEVEL 4

56

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

208
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

144

26%

LEVEL 2

202

36%

LEVEL 3

146

26%

LEVEL 4

62

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

83

68%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

86

73%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 646

LEVEL 1

202

31%

LEVEL 2

251

39%

LEVEL 3

141

22%

LEVEL 4

52

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 646

LEVEL 1

224

35%

LEVEL 2

223

35%

LEVEL 3

139

22%

LEVEL 4

60

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

181
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

167

29%

LEVEL 2

231

40%

LEVEL 3

129

22%

LEVEL 4

52

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

187
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

175

31%

LEVEL 2

208

36%

LEVEL 3

132

23%

LEVEL 4

55

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

38

45%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

55

54%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.