Skip to Content
Main content

PS 46 EDGAR ALLAN POE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

214

47%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

80

18%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

167

42%

LEVEL 2

114

29%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

102

45%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

80

41%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

112

49%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

87

42%

LEVEL 2

63

31%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

28

42%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

19
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

178

49%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

63

17%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

140

43%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

119

37%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

76

23%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

100

34%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

95

75%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

67

66%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

91

33%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

108
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

73

29%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

123

71%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

8

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

94

66%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

10

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

200

48%

LEVEL 2

129

31%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

159

44%

LEVEL 2

103

29%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

164

48%

LEVEL 2

101

30%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

91
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

119

40%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

73

25%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

50

45%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

27
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

48

46%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.