Skip to Content
Main content

PS 9 RYER AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

147

39%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

80

21%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

126

33%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

51

28%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

96

49%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

77

40%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

20

38%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

17

30%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

18

32%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

122

39%

LEVEL 2

104

33%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

113
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

107

33%

LEVEL 2

101

31%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

84

30%

LEVEL 2

97

34%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

82

28%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

104

35%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

63

68%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

44

49%

LEVEL 2

39

43%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

105
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

76

29%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

136
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

105

39%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

71

62%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

78

65%

LEVEL 2

36

30%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

9

29%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

136

40%

LEVEL 2

106

31%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

121

34%

LEVEL 2

108

30%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

104

39%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

51

19%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

104
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

86

31%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

39
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

43

40%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

38
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

40

37%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.