HARRIET TUBMAN CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

49

12%

LEVEL 2

119

29%

LEVEL 3

177

43%

LEVEL 4

70

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

51

12%

LEVEL 2

135

33%

LEVEL 3

153

37%

LEVEL 4

74

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

104

47%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

96

42%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

73

38%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

164
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

114

41%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

146
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

94

36%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

38

29%

LEVEL 3

60

45%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

55

40%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

163

45%

LEVEL 4

66

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

138

39%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

14

28%

LEVEL 2

18

36%

LEVEL 3

14

28%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

15

27%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

234
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

164

43%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

222
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

128

33%

LEVEL 3

148

38%

LEVEL 4

74

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

36

42%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

16

34%

LEVEL 4

11

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

141

43%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

121

33%

LEVEL 3

137

37%

LEVEL 4

63

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

223
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

43

11%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

157

42%

LEVEL 4

66

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

24
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

20

50%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.