Skip to Content
Main content

IS 313 SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP DEV GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

142

53%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

127

53%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

54

44%

LEVEL 2

48

39%

LEVEL 3

16

13%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

59

54%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

88

62%

LEVEL 2

38

27%

LEVEL 3

14

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

68

52%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

24

38%

LEVEL 2

26

41%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

103

59%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

98

57%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

94

44%

LEVEL 2

81

38%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

41
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

95

50%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

48

89%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

32

64%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

38
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

82

43%

LEVEL 2

72

38%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

61

39%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

60

81%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

66

80%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

134

54%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

119

54%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

111

53%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

99

52%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

31

53%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

28

54%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.