PS 204 MORRIS HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

119

38%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

87

26%

LEVEL 3

143

43%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

60

38%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

80

43%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

59

39%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

41

27%

LEVEL 3

63

42%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

14

18%

LEVEL 2

31

39%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

14

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

18

20%

LEVEL 2

25

28%

LEVEL 3

38

42%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

119
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

92

43%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

139
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

101

43%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

110

44%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

130

48%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

19

31%

LEVEL 2

33

54%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

28

43%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

159
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

113

40%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

187
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

137

45%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

21

42%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

25

53%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

98

38%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

162
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

48

17%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

118

41%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

147
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

108

40%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

163
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

121

43%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

8

16%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

22

43%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.