Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 218 R H DUAL LANG MAGNET GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

164

27%

LEVEL 2

210

34%

LEVEL 3

178

29%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 653

LEVEL 1

214

33%

LEVEL 2

211

32%

LEVEL 3

166

25%

LEVEL 4

62

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

85

27%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

111

37%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

129

38%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

11

44%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

215
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

156

28%

LEVEL 2

192

34%

LEVEL 3

164

29%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

206
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 609

LEVEL 1

207

34%

LEVEL 2

196

32%

LEVEL 3

150

25%

LEVEL 4

56

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

182

36%

LEVEL 3

167

33%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

136

26%

LEVEL 2

178

33%

LEVEL 3

156

29%

LEVEL 4

62

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

71

63%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

78

64%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

225
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

74

16%

LEVEL 2

154

34%

LEVEL 3

166

37%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

222
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

103

21%

LEVEL 2

164

34%

LEVEL 3

160

33%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

90

57%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

111

68%

LEVEL 2

47

29%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

14

20%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

11

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

27

31%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

207
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

150

28%

LEVEL 2

183

34%

LEVEL 3

159

29%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 565

LEVEL 1

187

33%

LEVEL 2

185

33%

LEVEL 3

142

25%

LEVEL 4

51

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

210
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

139

26%

LEVEL 2

181

34%

LEVEL 3

154

29%

LEVEL 4

56

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

205
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

174

31%

LEVEL 2

174

31%

LEVEL 3

148

27%

LEVEL 4

57

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

27
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

25

31%

LEVEL 2

29

36%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

40

40%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.