IS 303 LEADERSHIP & COMM SERVICE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

101

36%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

83

29%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

60

42%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

27

20%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

22

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

41

30%

LEVEL 2

43

32%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

56

36%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

27
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

19

29%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

19

29%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

34

44%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

79

38%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

85
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

45

22%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

89

42%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

32

48%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

48

51%

LEVEL 2

35

37%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

126
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

99

39%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

102
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

12

55%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

22

58%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

80%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

82

29%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

52

22%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

85

36%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

69

27%

LEVEL 2

96

38%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

8

21%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

16

41%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.