Skip to Content
Main content

PS 110 THEODORE SCHOENFELD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

45

24%

LEVEL 2

90

47%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

56

29%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

47

24%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

45

46%

LEVEL 3

24

24%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

23

24%

LEVEL 2

37

39%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

30

32%

LEVEL 2

45

48%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

33

34%

LEVEL 2

38

39%

LEVEL 3

23

23%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

17

24%

LEVEL 2

34

47%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

29

41%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

22

21%

LEVEL 2

50

48%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

31

29%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

53
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

71

50%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

63

42%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

26

54%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

26

59%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

54
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

73

46%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

17

53%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

19

50%

LEVEL 2

17

45%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

87

47%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

55

29%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

73

50%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

42
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

35

25%

LEVEL 2

64

45%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

14

32%

LEVEL 2

17

39%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

21

40%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.