PS 35 FRANZ SIEGEL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

112

36%

LEVEL 2

121

39%

LEVEL 3

65

21%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

103

35%

LEVEL 2

119

41%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

40

27%

LEVEL 2

63

43%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

68

43%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

63

43%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

26

30%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

20

23%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

26

31%

LEVEL 2

32

39%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

81

38%

LEVEL 2

84

39%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

74

37%

LEVEL 2

83

42%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

67

28%

LEVEL 2

101

43%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

90

43%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

45

59%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

47

57%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

74
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

105

45%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

69
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

62

27%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

56

72%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

41

67%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

104

36%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

99

36%

LEVEL 2

114

41%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

71
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

96

36%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

58
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

74

32%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

16

35%

LEVEL 2

21

46%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

29

48%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.