Skip to Content
Main content

PS/MS 4 CROTONA PARK WEST GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

110

36%

LEVEL 2

127

42%

LEVEL 3

55

18%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

100

34%

LEVEL 2

113

39%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

48

30%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

62

42%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

62

43%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

62

37%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

53

33%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

47

35%

LEVEL 2

61

46%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

63

27%

LEVEL 2

105

45%

LEVEL 3

53

23%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

56

25%

LEVEL 2

95

42%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

47

65%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

44

67%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

93

34%

LEVEL 2

113

41%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

74
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

77

31%

LEVEL 2

101

40%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

17

52%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

23

58%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

102

36%

LEVEL 2

123

43%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

94

34%

LEVEL 2

109

40%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

64

33%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

40

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

54
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

46

41%

LEVEL 2

48

43%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

41

39%

LEVEL 2

40

38%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.