JHS 131 ALBERT EINSTEIN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

170

39%

LEVEL 2

146

34%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

198

44%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

80

18%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

49

23%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

82

34%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

110

51%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

116

54%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

31

14%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

48

34%

LEVEL 2

55

39%

LEVEL 3

22

16%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

62

43%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

65
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

115

44%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

130

45%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

67

22%

LEVEL 4

41

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

104

32%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

78

24%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

84

65%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

94

75%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

115
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

135

35%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

121
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

162

40%

LEVEL 2

124

30%

LEVEL 3

79

19%

LEVEL 4

42

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

35

74%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

36

77%

LEVEL 2

10

21%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

21

31%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

23

31%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

18

24%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

149

41%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

175

46%

LEVEL 2

110

29%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

102
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

133

37%

LEVEL 2

128

35%

LEVEL 3

63

17%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

105
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

159

42%

LEVEL 2

112

30%

LEVEL 3

71

19%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

37

53%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

17
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

39

50%

LEVEL 2

22

28%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.