MS 101 EDWARD R BYRNE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

58

11%

LEVEL 2

111

22%

LEVEL 3

160

31%

LEVEL 4

183

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

66

12%

LEVEL 2

107

20%

LEVEL 3

146

28%

LEVEL 4

211

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

198
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

55

20%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

113

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

206
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

63

21%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

124

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

70

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

87

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

60
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

45

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

78
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

60

71%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

30

32%

LEVEL 4

35

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

27

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

16

32%

LEVEL 4

18

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

24

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

175
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

72

25%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

78

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

180
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

94

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

68

17%

LEVEL 3

136

35%

LEVEL 4

175

44%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

63

16%

LEVEL 3

124

31%

LEVEL 4

201

50%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

43

36%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

48

39%

LEVEL 2

44

35%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

342
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

52

10%

LEVEL 2

110

22%

LEVEL 3

159

32%

LEVEL 4

183

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

357
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

61

12%

LEVEL 2

106

20%

LEVEL 3

146

28%

LEVEL 4

211

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

48

37%

LEVEL 4

51

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

58

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

244
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

89

23%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

132

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

250
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

80

21%

LEVEL 3

97

25%

LEVEL 4

153

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

331
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

54

11%

LEVEL 2

105

21%

LEVEL 3

153

31%

LEVEL 4

178

36%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

348
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

64

12%

LEVEL 2

105

20%

LEVEL 3

141

27%

LEVEL 4

207

40%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.