JHS 123 JAMES M KIERNAN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

116

39%

LEVEL 2

107

36%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

146

42%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

46

31%

LEVEL 2

60

40%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

66

37%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

70

47%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

31
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

80

47%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

29

44%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

31

43%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

83

38%

LEVEL 2

82

38%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

109

43%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

75

31%

LEVEL 2

97

40%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

109

36%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

41

76%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

37

77%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

92

41%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

85
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

82

30%

LEVEL 2

106

39%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

55

76%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

64

84%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

10

28%

LEVEL 2

17

47%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

106

40%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

128

43%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

56

19%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

84

36%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

108

40%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

32

51%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

38

49%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.