PS 161 JUAN PONCE DE LEON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

54

30%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

55

33%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

26

36%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

35

34%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

36

38%

LEVEL 2

37

39%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

37

29%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

40

32%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

47

37%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

49

40%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

31

58%

LEVEL 2

18

34%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

31

69%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

59
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

50
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

39

28%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

16

62%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

54

33%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

40

29%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

37

27%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

14

39%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.