Skip to Content
Main content

PS 5 PORT MORRIS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

188

46%

LEVEL 2

138

33%

LEVEL 3

71

17%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

145

36%

LEVEL 2

136

34%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

73

38%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

59

31%

LEVEL 2

57

30%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

115

52%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

86

41%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

36

17%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

53

46%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

19

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

31

26%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

131

47%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

46

16%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

78
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

102

38%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

126

39%

LEVEL 2

121

37%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

94

29%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

62

73%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

51

63%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

123

38%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

115
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

92

29%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

90

29%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

65

71%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

53

60%

LEVEL 2

28

32%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

183

46%

LEVEL 2

135

34%

LEVEL 3

66

17%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

143

36%

LEVEL 2

135

34%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

151

45%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

100
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

113

34%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

37

48%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

11

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

22
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

32

43%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.