EAST SIDE COMMUNITY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

90

36%

LEVEL 4

66

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

43

40%

LEVEL 4

23

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

48

40%

LEVEL 4

40

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

30

25%

LEVEL 2

38

31%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

20
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

24

51%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

40
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

25

50%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

50

40%

LEVEL 3

39

31%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

80
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

56

42%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

66

36%

LEVEL 4

46

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

64

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

23

47%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

28

58%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

30

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

33

36%

LEVEL 4

35

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

57

36%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

66

31%

LEVEL 4

49

23%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

142
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

80

36%

LEVEL 4

62

28%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.