JHS 143 ELEANOR ROOSEVELT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

124

54%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

118

53%

LEVEL 2

61

28%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

42

47%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

48

50%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

82

58%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

70

56%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

116

54%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

106

52%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

40
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

76

45%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

70

44%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

48

79%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

48

79%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

44
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

18

17%

LEVEL 2

43

41%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

38
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

22

22%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

32

32%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

106

84%

LEVEL 2

17

13%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

96

79%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

113

54%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

110

54%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

34

17%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

37
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

100

53%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

36
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

101

53%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

24

59%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

17

57%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.