Skip to Content
Main content

PS 152 DYCKMAN VALLEY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

90

36%

LEVEL 2

90

36%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

86

37%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

36

30%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

40

37%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

54

41%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

46

36%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

86

36%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

61

25%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

82

37%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

52

27%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

60

31%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

38

69%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

30

67%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

69
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

36

20%

LEVEL 2

71

40%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

74

42%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

54

72%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

43

74%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

41
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

46

34%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

46
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

55

37%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

30
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

44

38%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

31

36%

LEVEL 2

41

48%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.