Skip to Content
Main content

PS 197 JOHN B RUSSWURM GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

19
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

64

45%

LEVEL 2

59

42%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

70

54%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

25

43%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

29

55%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

39

46%

LEVEL 2

35

42%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

41

53%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

38

47%

LEVEL 2

34

42%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

44

58%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

10

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

16
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

31

34%

LEVEL 2

45

49%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

20
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

42

47%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

33

66%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

28

70%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

23
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

67

54%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

59

44%

LEVEL 2

56

42%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

68

56%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

18

15%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

56

49%

LEVEL 2

45

39%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

56

54%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

14

52%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.